CONCEPTUALISATION OF CIVIC VALUES IN THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF PRIMARY SCHOOL CHILDREN WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol13i10-012Keywords:
civic values; social development; primary school children; intellectual disabilities; special education; socialisation; value orientations; social adaptationAbstract
The article presents a conceptual analysis of the notion of civic values in the context of the social development of primary school children with intellectual disabilities. The existing body of research provides a solid theoretical foundation for civic education. However, there is a pressing need to adapt these general concepts for primary school children with intellectual disabilities, as their specific characteristics require special mechanisms for conceptualising (comprehending) abstract values. It has been established that the social development of an individual in a modern democratic society is impossible without a well-formed system of civic values (respect, responsibility, cooperation, tolerance). The primary school age is a critical period for acquiring these fundamental social norms and guidelines. Due to cognitive specificities (concrete thinking, impaired generalisation, reduced abstract-logical operations), primary school children with intellectual disabilities experience significant difficulties in conceptualising abstract civic values. They may memorise terms mechanically but fail to grasp their essence and practical meaning in everyday life. It is substantiated that primary cognitive deficits and secondary impairments of the emotional and volitional spheres significantly complicate the process of mastering moral and social norms, thus requiring a specialised pedagogical approach. It is determined that civic values (tolerance, responsibility, respect) for this group of learners must be translated into the sphere of concrete, operationalised behavioural indicators. The structure of social development is analysed, revealing that the formation of self-concept and prosocial behaviour is critically important for integration. The article emphasises the necessity of developing specialised diagnostic tools for the valid assessment of value orientations. The presented findings serve as a theoretical basis for the creation of effective correctional and educational programmes.
References
Арабаджиєв Д.Ю. Дискурс формування громадянської ідентичності родових суб’єктів освітнього простору як детермінанта розвитку громадянськості на регіональному рівні в Україні. Гуманітарний дискурс: політика, управління, влада. Одеса: Гельветика, 2015. C. 326–338.
Докторович М.О. Соціальна компетентність як соціальна проблема. Психологія і суспільство. 2019. № 3. С. 144–147.
Особистісно орієнтовані технології національно-патріотичного виховання учнівської молоді в громадських об’єднаннях: методичний посібник. Київ Кропивницький: Імекс-ЛТД, 2018. 176 с.
Сухомлинська О. В. Громадянське виховання і сучасна освіта: від здобутого – до нових акцентів і наголосів. Педагогіка і психологія. № 2 (87). 2015. С. 5–13.
Нова українська школа : порадник для вчителя. / Під заг. ред. Бібік Н.М. Київ : ТОВ «Видавничий дім «Плеяди», 2017. 206 с.
Шиліна Н.Є. Проблема виховання дітей з особливими освітніми потребами в умовах сім’ї та освітніх установ. Науковий вісник Південноукраїнського національного педагогічного університету імені К.Д. Ушинського. Випуск 3 (128). Одеса, 2019. С. 42‒49.
Lim C. P. Global citizenship education, school curriculum and games: Learning mathematics, English and science as a global citizen. Computers & Education. 2008. № 51(3). Рр.1073–1093.
Hеrbert Y. Education for Democratic Citizenship: Issues of Theory and Practice. Journal of International Migration and Integration. 2007. № 8 (2). Рр.247–248.
Hеrbert Y., Sears A. Citizenship Education. Toronto. Canadian Education Association, 2001.
Osler A. & Starkey H. Education for democratic citizenship: A review of References research, policy and practice 1995–2005. Research Papers in Education. № 21 (4). 2006. Рр. 433–466.
Oxfam. Education for global citizenship: A guide for schools. Oxford, UK. Oxfam Development Education, 2006.
Shultz L. Educating for global citizenship: Conflicting agendas and understandings. Alberta Journal of Educational Research. № 53 (3). 2007. Рр. 248–258. URL: http://www.education.ualberta.ca/educ/journals/ajer/53%20files/53(3)files/53(3).html
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Тетяна Опалюк

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)that allows others freely to use (read, copy and print) submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.


