PROMOTION AS A COMPONENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY ENHANCEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol13i9-013Keywords:
promotion, higher education, strategic marketing, university brand, educational management, unique value proposition, reputational capital, digital transformationAbstract
The article presents a comprehensive theoretical and methodological analysis of the concept of "promotion" in the context of the strategic management of higher education institutions (HEIs), taking into account the dynamics of transformation in the modern educational environment influenced by globalization, digitalization, and internationalization. The evolution of the interpretation of "promotion" in communication, educational, and marketing discourses is explored – from traditional market-driven promotional tools to a complex, integrated mechanism that ensures the university's reputational capital and strategic visibility in national and global educational markets. It is substantiated that promotion is not merely a part of informational policy, but a key component of strategic marketing, reputation management, brand communications, institutional positioning, and the formation of the university’s Unique Value Proposition (UVP). Promotional activities play a decisive role in attracting prospective students, establishing international cooperation, expanding partnership networks, and building lasting trust among core target audiences (students, parents, alumni, employers, donor organizations). The article emphasizes the need to develop a systemic, long-term, and vision-oriented strategy for promotional activity that aligns with the mission, values, and academic profile of each HEI. It is demonstrated that effective promotion not only enhances institutional competitiveness but also contributes to the harmonization of the university’s academic, communication, marketing, and managerial subsystems. The UVP is highlighted as the conceptual core of brand identity, capable of differentiating the educational offering in a saturated services market. The article proposes promising directions for future research, including: empirical evaluation of the impact of promotional activity on admissions performance; development of adaptive branding models under digital transformation conditions; comparative analysis of international practices in higher education promotion; creation of indicators to assess the effectiveness of marketing communications in HEIs; and examination of the relationship between brand strength and institutional sustainability.
References
Грішнова О. А., Зінченко В. Ф. Erasmus+ як чинник євроінтеграції системи вищої освіти України. Вища освіта України. 2020. № 2. С. 30–36.
Ілляшенко С. М. Інтегровані маркетингові комунікації у вищій освіті : монографія. Суми : СумДУ, 2020. 312 с.
Коновалова С. О. Цифрові стратегії просування освітніх послуг у вищій школі : монографія. Харків : ХНАДУ, 2021. 284 с.
Ляшенко І. І., Чернобай О. І. Брендинг у вищій освіті: зарубіжний досвід та вітчизняні перспективи. Інноваційна економіка. 2021. № 4. С. 74–82.
Решетнікова І. Маркетинг в прямих логістичних каналах: сучасні тенденції. Маркетинг в Україні. 2015. № 1. С. 46–52.
Edmiston‑Strasser D. M. An Examination of Integrated Marketing Communication in U.S. Public Institutions of Higher Education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 2009. Vol. 19, No. 2. P. 142–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841240903423166
Hemsley‑Brown J., Oplatka I. Universities in a Competitive Global Marketplace: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Higher Education Marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2006. Vol. 19, No. 4. P. 316–338.
Ivy J. A new higher education marketing mix: the 7Ps for MBA marketing. International Journal of Educational Management. 2008. Vol. 22, No. 4. P. 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540810875635
Kaleta A., Mierzejewska B. Digital Transformation of Universities in Central and Eastern Europe – Strategic and Marketing Implications. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy. 2021. Vol. 9, No. 3. P. 341–357.
Keller K. L. Conceptualizing, Measuring and Managing Customer‑Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing. 1993. Vol. 57, No. 1. P. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252054
Kotler P., Fox K. Strategic marketing for educational institutions. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice‑Hall, 1995. 420 p.
Kotler P., Keller K. Marketing Management. Harlow : Pearson, 2019. 816 p.
Kliatchko J. G. Towards a New Definition of Integrated Marketing Communications (IMC). International Journal of Advertising. 2005. Vol. 24, No. 1. P. 7–34.
Lawlor J., Hornyak M. Smart University Marketing: Strategies for Attracting and Retaining Students in a Digital Era. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 2012. Vol. 22, No. 2. P. 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2012.738717
Maringe F., Gibbs P. Marketing Higher Education: Theory and Practice. Maidenhead : McGraw‑Hill/Open University Press, 2009. 224 p.
Roy S., Misra S. Impact of Integrated Marketing Communication Strategies on Choice of Higher Education Institutions. Innovative Marketing. 2024. Vol. 20, No. 4. P. 74–84. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.20(4).2024.07
Schultz D. E., Tannenbaum S. I., Lauterborn R. F. Integrated Marketing Communications: Putting It Together and Making It Work. Lincolnwood, IL : NTC Business Books, 1993. 369 p.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Олексій Мойсієнко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)that allows others freely to use (read, copy and print) submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.


