EXPERIMENTAL JUSTIFICATION OF THE METHODOLOGY FOR INITIAL TRAINING IN BASIC ELEMENTS OF RHYTHMIC GYMNASTICS FOR CHILDREN AGED 5–6

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol13i8-018

Keywords:

rhythmic gymnastics, initial training, basic elements, special exercises, physical fitness

Abstract

This article presents a pedagogical experiment designed to substantiate and verify a staged algorithm for initial training in the basic elements of rhythmic gymnastics in children aged 5–6 years. A year-long macrocycle - familiarization, preparatory, corrective, instructional, and formative phases—was organized with three control assessments, integrating targeted development of key motor abilities (flexibility, balance, coordination, speed-strength) with systematic acquisition of technical skills (“swallow”, shoulder stand, bridge, rolls, turns, and jumps with/without apparatus). Sixteen girls aged 5–6 participated. Baseline profiles guided individualized selection of preparatory and auxiliary drills. Monitoring combined tests of special physical fitness with expert judging by five first-category referees using a 10-point scale. Statistical processing (means, standard errors, Student’s t, p-values) revealed significant gains: shoulder stand improved from 4.49±0.21 to 5.22±0.23 (t=2.31; p<0.05), forward roll from 4.30±0.26 to 5.15±0.28 (t=2.27; p<0.05), bridge from 4.00±0.29 to 5.16±0.26 (t=3.00; p<0.01), straight-arm dislocation with a stick from 3.35±0.22 to 5.92±0.33 (t=6.45; p<0.001), cross split from 4.04±0.26 to 5.21±0.30 (t=2.93; p<0.01); jump variants rose to 5.35±0.34 (t=3.07; p<0.01) and 5.21±0.28 (t=2.22; p<0.05). These effects reflect a progression from simple to complex, with an emphasis on active flexibility and balance, systematic training of rhythmization and kinesthetic control, and apparatus-based drills that increase sensorimotor demands. The study’s novelty lies in an integrated, algorithm-driven path for mastering basic elements coupled with individualized preparatory exercise sets tailored to preschool capabilities. Practically, the macrocycle structure, control checkpoints, scoring criteria, and exercise catalog provide a ready-to-apply template for children’s sports schools to plan sessions and monitor individual progress.

References

Черних, Т., Мулик, В., Скалій, Т., & Окунь, Д. (2020). Застосування спеціально-підготовчих вправ для засвоєння базових елементів спортивної акробатики юними спортсменами-початківцями. Слобожанський науково-спортивний вісник, 6(80), 11–16.

Харченко, Т. П., & Мулик, В. В. (2009). Дослідження надійності та інформативності тестів для визначення статичної та динамічної рівноваги в юних фігуристів 7–9 років. Слобожанський науково-спортивний вісник, (3), 82–84.

Черних, Т., Мулик, В., & Окунь, Д. (2019). Дослідження рівня фізичної підготовленості юних спортсменів-акробатів на початковому етапі підготовки. Слобожанський науково-спортивний вісник, 5(73), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.15391/snsv.2019-5.010

Матвєєв, Л. П. (1999). Основи загальної теорії спорту і системи підготовки спортсменів. Київ: Олімпійська література.

Платонов, В. Н., & Сахновський, К. П. (1988). Підготовка юного спортсмена. Київ: Радянська школа.

Платонов, В. Н. (2017). Рухові якості і фізична підготовка спортсменів. Київ: Олімпійська література.

Riabchenko, O., & Elmira Elkhan kyzy, A. (2021). Determination of the correlation dependence of mastering the basic elements of rhythmic gymnastics on the use of the classical exercise by girls 5–6 years old. Slobozhanskyi naukovo-sportyvnyi visnyk, 9(6), 44–54.

Di Cagno, A., Baldari, C., Battaglia, C., Monteiro, M. D., Pappalardo, A., Piazza, M., & Guidetti, L. (2009). Factors influencing performance of competitive and amateur rhythmic gymnastics: Gender differences. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12(3), 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2008.01.006

Jemni, M. (2011). The science of gymnastics. Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323643059_The_Science_of_Gymnastics_Edition_2-_Advanced_Studies

Douda, H. T., Toubekis, A. G., Avloniti, A. A., & Tokmakidis, S. P. (2008). Physiological and anthropometric determinants of rhythmic gymnastics performance. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 3(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.3.1.41

Marina, M., & Rodríguez, F. A. (2014). Physiological demands of young women's competitive gymnastic routines. Biology of Sport, 31(3), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1111849

Chernyshenko, T., Romanenko, V., & Krasnobayeva, T. (2025). Special training by means of musical rhythm for 6–7-year-old rhythmic gymnasts at the initial preparation stage. Physical Culture, Sports and Health of the Nation, 19(38), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.31652/2071-5285-2025-19(38)-250-260

Fedoryaka, A. V. (2025). Development of coordination abilities in girls aged 7–8 years by means of aesthetic gymnastics. In Integration of Education, Science and Business in Modern Environment: Winter Debates (6th Int. Sci. Pract. Internet Conf., February 6–7, 2025, p. 322).

Payne, V. G., & Isaacs, L. D. (2017). Human motor development: A lifespan approach (9th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213040

Favoritov, V. M., & Silyavina, K. A. (2014). Features and effectiveness of the methodology of targeted flexibility development in young gymnasts aged 6–7. Slobozhanskyi herald of science and sport, 2, 121–124.

Downloads


Abstract views: 160
PDF Downloads: 116

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Riabchenko О., Tykhorskyi О., & Mulyk В. (2025). EXPERIMENTAL JUSTIFICATION OF THE METHODOLOGY FOR INITIAL TRAINING IN BASIC ELEMENTS OF RHYTHMIC GYMNASTICS FOR CHILDREN AGED 5–6. Education. Innovation. Practice, 13(8), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol13i8-018

Issue

Section

Статті

Most read articles by the same author(s)