ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES: AMERICAN CONTEXT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol13i5-014

Keywords:

after-school education, extracurricular activity, essential characteristics, extracurricular programs, classification of extracurricular programs, elements of extracurricular activity, USA

Abstract

The article analyzes the essential characteristics of extracurricular activity in the American context. It highlights the absence of a universally accepted definition of the term “extracurricular activity.” Based on the analysis of scholarly literature, it was found that the meaning of the term “extracurricular” is generally treated as intuitively understood and/or explained through descriptive features, either in terms of specific types of activities or their inherent characteristics. The article presents summary tables from foreign academic studies that provide descriptive characteristics of extracurricular activities, as well as definitions/descriptions from online sources. These sources indicate a considerable variability in both the nature and scope of extracurricular activities, and suggest that such activities take place outside the classroom or regular curriculum, may be either academic or non-academic, and are voluntary or optional in nature. A working definition of “extracurricular activity” is proposed as follows: academic or non-academic activities that take place outside of school or under the auspices of the school, but occur outside of regular class time, are not part of the formal curriculum, do not involve grading or academic credit, and are voluntary for the student. The article also provides a classification of high-quality extracurricular programs in the U.S., which groups all extracurricular programs into three main categories, regardless of whether the program is aimed at academic improvement or youth development/safety: academic, recreational, and cultural. Based on the analysis, synthesis, and generalization of existing data on extracurricular activities and programs in the U.S., three key dimensions within the structure of extracurricular programs are identified: 1) infrastructure – program resources, personnel management practices, and program administration; 2) partnership – collaboration with schools, families, and communities; 3) Program/Practice – quality components, strategies, and activities of the program.

References

Ahadiat N. Smith K.J. A factor-analytic investigation of employee selection factors of significance to recruiters of entry-level accountants. Issues in Accounting Education. 1994. No 99(1). P. 59-79.

Barnett L. “Winners” and “losers”: The effects of being allowed or denied entry into competitive extracurricular activities. Journal of Leisure Research. 2007. No 39. P. 316-341.

Brown B.K., Campion M.A. Biodata phenomenology: Recruiters’ perceptions and use of biographical information in résumé screening. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1994. No 79. P. 897–908.

Brown E., McComb E., & Scott-Little C. Expanded learning opportunities programs: A review of the research and evaluations on participant outcomes in school readiness and after-school programs. Greensboro, NC: SERVE, 2003. URL: http://www.serve.org/_downloads/REL/ELO/AfterSchool.pdf

Campion M.A. Identification of variables most influential in determining interviewers’ evaluations of applicants in a college placement center. Psychological Reports. 1978. No 42. P. 947–952.

Chia Y. M. Job offers of multi-national accounting firms: The effects of emotional intelligence, extra-curricular activities, and academic performance. Accounting Education: An International Journal. 2005. No 14(1). P. 75–93.

Clotfelder C. T. Who are the alumni donors? Giving by two generations of alumni from selective colleges. Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 2001. No 12(2). P. 119-138.

Cole M.S., Rubin R.S., Feild H.S., Giles W.F. Recruiters’ perceptions and use of applicant résumé information: Screening the recent graduate. Applied Psychology: An International Review. 2007. No 56(2). P. 319-343

Fashola O. Review of extended-day and after-school programs and their effectiveness. Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk (CRESPAR). U.S. Department of Education, 1998. URL: http://www.csos.jhu.edu/crespar/techreports/report24.pdf

Fredricks J. A., Eccles J. S. Is extracurricular participation associated with beneficial outcomes: Concurrent and longitudinal relations? Developmental Psychology. 2006. No 42. P. 698–713.

Hall G., Yohalem N., Tolman J. & Wilson A. How afterschool programs can most effectively promote positive youth development as a support to academic achievement: A report commissioned by the Boston after-school for all partnership. National Institute on Out-of-School Time, Center for Research on Women at Wellesley Centers for Women, Wellesley College, 2003. URL: http://www.niost.org/wcw3.pdf

Hammond C., Reimer M. Essential elements of quality afterschool programs. Clemson, 2006. 73 р.

Hollister R. The growth in after-school programs and their impact. Developed for the Brookings Roundtable on Children. 2003. URL: http://www.brook.edu/dybdocroot/views/papers/sawhill/20030225.pdf

Kerr B.A., Colangelo N. The college plans of academically talented students. Journal of Counseling & Development. 1988. No 67(1). P. 42-48.

Keser F., Akar H. & Yildirim A. The role of extracurricular activities in active citizenship education. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2011. No 43(6). P. 809-837.

Kinicki A.J., Lockwood C.A. The interview process: An examination of factors recruiters use in evaluating job applicants. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1985. No 26. P. 117–125.

Mahoney J.L., Cairns B.D., Farmer T.W. Promoting interpersonal competence and educational success through extracurricular activity participation. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2003. No 95(2). P. 409-418.

Marsh H. W., Kleitman S. Extracurricular school activities: The good, the bad, and the nonlinear. Harvard Educational Review. 2002. No 72. P. 464–514.

McGaha V. & Fitzpatrick J. Employment, academic and extracurricular contributors to college aspirations. Journal of College Admission. 2010. No 207. P. 22-29.

Miller B. M. Critical hours: Afterschool programs and educational success. Quincy, MA: Nellie Mae Education Foundation, 2003. URL: http://www.nmefdn.org/CriticalHours.htm.

Nelson I. T., Vendrzyk V. P., Quirin J. J., Allen R. D. No, the sky is not falling: Evidence of accounting student characteristics at FSA schools, 1995-2000. Issues in Accounting Education. 2002. No 17(3). P. 269-287.

Noam G., Biancarosa G., Dechausay N. Afterschool education: Approaches to an emerging field. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2003.

Office of Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). Model programs guide for afterschool /recreation. 2005. URL: http://www.dsgonline.com/mpg2.5/afterschool_recreation_prevention.htm

Paquero A.A. Immigrant youth involvement in school-based extracurricular activities. The Journal of Educational Research. 2011. No 104. P. 19-27.

Raymond M.A., Carlson L., Hopkins C.D. Do perceptions of hiring criteria differ for sales managers and sales representatives? Implications for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education. 2006. No 28(1). P. 43–55.

Rubin R. S., Bommer W. H., & Baldwin T. T. Using extracurricular activity as an indicator of interpersonal skill: Prudent evaluation or recruiting malpractice? Human Resource Management. 2002. No 41. P. 441– 454.

Rubin R.S., Bommer W.H., Baldwin T.T. Using extracurricular activity as an indicator of interpersonal skill: Prudent evaluation or recruiting malpractice? Human Resource Management. 2002. No 41. P. 441–454.

The Forum for Youth Investment (FYI). Out of-school research meets after-school policy. Washington, DC: The Forum for Youth Investment, Impact Strategies, Inc., 2002. URL: http://www.forumfyi.org/files//ostpc1.pdf

Downloads


Abstract views: 2259
PDF Downloads: 103

Published

2025-05-30

How to Cite

Chystiakova І., & Latyshev В. (2025). ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES: AMERICAN CONTEXT. Education. Innovation. Practice, 13(5), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol13i5-014

Issue

Section

Статті